The field, mapped honestly.

Roundups and alternatives pages, each entry described by its own stated job and linked to a deeper comparison. No catch-rate claims, no disparagement, and Aevral never listed as a like-for-like alternative to a SAST: it is the reading you add alongside.

RoundupWhole-repo AI security scanners in 2026There are now several ways to put a scanner over a whole repository, and they are not one category. Some scan code against rules, some model it as a database, some review pull requests, some guard the dependency tree. This is a neutral map of that field: one line per tool on what it focuses on, a link to a deeper comparison, and no catch-rate claims about anyone.Read the map
RoundupIDOR and broken access control scanners in 2026Access control is the bug class where the code looks fine and the rule is wrong: an object another tenant owns, a route that lost its gate, a role list that grew by one. Each tool below publishes a security scope that names this surface, and the published shapes differ: rule and dataflow matching with AI detection, agentic source audits, PR review bots, and remediation agents, per each tool's own site. Every entry is described by its own stated job and links to a deeper comparison where the split with Aevral is stated on the page.Read the map
AlternativesSemgrep alternativesIf you are evaluating Semgrep, it helps to see the wider field. The tools below cover code security in different ways: rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, platform breadth, pull-request review, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison.Read the map
AlternativesSnyk Code alternativesIf you are evaluating Snyk Code, it helps to see the wider field. The tools below cover code security in different ways: rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, platform breadth, pull-request review, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison.Read the map
AlternativesAikido alternativesIf you are evaluating Aikido, it helps to see the wider field. Aikido is a developer security platform: SAST, dependencies, secrets, IaC, and pentest, and it publishes Code Security Audit and Deep Review, agentic reading of source for authorization, IDOR, and business logic, per Aikido's docs. The tools below cover code security in different ways: rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, other platform breadth, pull-request review, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison; Aikido's page with Aevral is at [aevral.com/compare/aikido](https://aevral.com/compare/aikido).Read the map
AlternativesCodeQL alternativesIf you are evaluating CodeQL, it helps to see the wider field. CodeQL is GitHub's semantic code analysis engine: it models code as a database and runs dataflow queries, and that is what GitHub code scanning runs on, per GitHub's docs. The tools below cover code security in different ways: rule-based scanning, other semantic analysis, platform breadth, pull-request review, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison.Read the map
AlternativesCodeRabbit alternativesIf you are evaluating CodeRabbit, it helps to see the wider field. CodeRabbit also publishes CodeRabbit Security, agentic code security monitoring: scheduled repository scans and security scans of each pull request, per CodeRabbit's site. The tools below cover code security and review in different ways: other pull-request reviewers, rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, platform analysis with quality gates, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison; CodeRabbit's page with Aevral is at [aevral.com/compare/coderabbit](https://aevral.com/compare/coderabbit).Read the map
AlternativesSonarQube alternativesIf you are evaluating SonarQube, it helps to see the wider field. SonarQube is a code quality and security platform: static analysis on branches and pull requests, quality gates, AI Code Assurance and AI CodeFix, and a Hunter Agent for logic flaws, per Sonar's site. The tools below cover code security in different ways: rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, platform breadth, pull-request review, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison.Read the map
AlternativesGreptile alternativesIf you are evaluating Greptile, it helps to see the wider field. Greptile is an AI code reviewer: it indexes the codebase as a graph and reviews each pull request with agents that read the change with codebase context, and it offers TREX, a beta agent that writes and runs tests for a pull request, per Greptile's site. The tools below cover code security and review in different ways: other pull-request reviewers, rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, platform analysis with quality gates, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison.Read the map
AlternativesBugbot alternativesIf you are evaluating Cursor Bugbot, it helps to see the wider field. Bugbot reviews pull requests and identifies bugs, security issues, and code quality problems, leaving comments with explanations and fix suggestions, per Cursor's docs. The tools below cover code security and review in different ways: other pull-request reviewers, rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, platform analysis with quality gates, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison; Bugbot's page with Aevral is at [aevral.com/compare/bugbot](https://aevral.com/compare/bugbot).Read the map
AlternativesGitHub Copilot code review alternativesIf you are evaluating Copilot code review, it helps to see the wider field. Copilot code review is GitHub's built-in AI reviewer: it reviews pull requests for bugs, code-quality issues, and security issues, and leaves comments with suggested changes you can apply in a couple of clicks; you can also set it to review new pull requests automatically, per GitHub's docs. The tools below cover code security and review in different ways: other pull-request reviewers, rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, platform analysis with quality gates, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison; Copilot code review's page with Aevral is at [aevral.com/compare/github-copilot](https://aevral.com/compare/github-copilot).Read the map
AlternativesKodus alternativesIf you are evaluating Kodus, it helps to see the wider field. Kodus is an open source AI code review platform (AGPL core): its review agent maps callers, callees, and tests across linked repositories, turns team rules written in plain language into enforced checks, and checks a pull request against acceptance criteria pulled from a linked Jira, Linear, or Notion ticket, per Kodus's site. The tools below cover code security and review in different ways: other pull-request reviewers, rule-based scanning, semantic analysis, platform analysis with quality gates, and the supply chain. Each links to a deeper comparison; Kodus's page with Aevral is at [aevral.com/compare/kodus](https://aevral.com/compare/kodus).Read the map

Evaluating Aevral against Claude Security or Codex Security? Each has its own even comparison: Aevral and Claude Security and Aevral and Codex Security. The alternatives pages here map the wider field.

Security review, handled.

Install the GitHub App and PR review starts on. Sign in with GitHub to connect it, then press Scan for the repository you already have.

Install the GitHub App Log in Sign up

For professional use. By installing, you confirm you can act for the account or organization that owns it, and you accept the Terms and DPA on its behalf.