Aevral does one job: reading authorization, IDOR, and business-logic access control across your repository. Claude Security competes for that job and gets the even, dated table. Eleven of the sixteen tools in the field publish security scope that touches the job, and each page carries the split. The other five do a different stated job, and you keep them.
The even comparison
Same job: scan the repository, review findings, hand off a fix. Different access, price shape, models, and fix path. An even table on nine rows, dated and sourced. Not a catch-rate boast.
Read the even table
Overlaps the job
These tools publish security scope that touches Aevral's job: scans or reviews for logic, authentication, or access-control issues. Each page carries the split: what they publish, what Aevral reads, and how they run together.
Different job
These tools state a different job on the same repositories. Each page shows the boundary in one table and a worked example of Aevral's reading.
No. Those tools do the scanning job they state, and you keep them. Aevral adds its own reading alongside: authorization, IDOR, and business-logic access control across the whole repository, and on every pull request through its opt-in PR review. PR review is live as an opt-in add-on per organization. Same repo, different question.
Claude Security is a repository scanning product built on a frontier model: it competes for the same job Aevral does, so it gets an even, dated, sourced table. Claude Security gets it because it is the comparison buyers actually bring, and the even table is an editorial commitment, not a claim that other tools never overlap. Eleven tools in the field publish security scope that touches the job, and their pages carry the split in plain words; the other five do a different stated job. Every page states the tool's published job and Aevral's reading.
No. Each page states the other tool's plainly-published job and Aevral's own reading, then shows one worked example of that reading. Results on your code depend on your code; evaluations belong to you.
One GitHub App. A report with evidence. A prompt for the agent you already use.