Two readings on one pull request: Corgea's scan and the fix it generates for you to open as a pull request, and Aevral, through its PR review, live on install, adding its security reading of the same change.
| Row | Corgea | Aevral |
|---|---|---|
| Question it answers | Does this change carry a flagged vulnerability, with a fix already generated? | Who has access to what, and does this change widen it? |
| Stated job | AI-powered SAST, SCA, container, and IaC scanning across the codebase and pull requests, per Corgea's site | Security reading of the PR diff: access control, business logic, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, LLM integration |
| Where it runs | Scans non-draft pull requests on open and on push, posts comments on the diff lines, per Corgea's documentation | GitHub Check and inline comments, live on install; scans run from the console on a chosen SHA |
| Unit of work | A generated fix you can open as a pull request with one click, per Corgea's documentation | Up to five findings per review, grounded on the added lines; scan findings come as leads with evidence |
| Complementary? | Yes | Yes |
Corgea is built as an AI-powered application security platform: it scans code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure, filters out false positives, and for each finding generates a fix you can open as a pull request with one click, per Corgea's documentation. Corgea's site also publishes business-logic and authorization detection, including broken authentication and missing auth checks, as part of that scan. Aevral reads the same question on the diff that opened the pull request: whether the change widens who has access to what, grounded in the lines actually changed, with a suggested fix prompt a human or their agent applies. Aevral never opens, pushes, or merges a pull request on its own.
The framing is addition, not replacement: Corgea's scans and the fixes it generates across the codebase, and Aevral adding its own authorization and business-logic reading of the same pull requests with its PR review, live on install, plus a whole-repo scan for the same classes. This page makes no claim about results on your code.
Corgea
Corgea is an AI-powered application security platform built for developers. It scans code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure, and for each finding generates a fix you can open as a pull request with one click, per Corgea's documentation.
Aevral
Security review, handled. PR review, live on install, looks for access control, business logic, SQL and command injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, unsafe deserialization, token and session flaws, and LLM-integration risks on the diff. Paid PR plans are live in the console. The whole-repo scan is live and self-serve, and reads authorization, IDOR, and business-logic access control only. A finding is a lead with evidence, and a human decides. No patches are auto-applied.
This change adds a CSV export branch to the handler that already renders a billing report on screen, inserted before the handler's existing role check.
export async function GET(req: Request) { const session = await requireSession(req); const report = await db.report.findUnique({ where: { id: reportId(req) } }); if (format(req) === "csv") { return new Response(toCsv(report), { headers: { "content-type": "text/csv" } }); } if (!session.roles.includes("billing")) throw new Forbidden(); return renderReport(report);}requireSession confirms the caller is logged in, and the role check two lines below still guards the screen-rendering return: only a session with billing access on this org reaches renderReport. The new CSV branch returns straight after loading the report, before that role check runs. Any authenticated member of any org who reaches a reportId gets the CSV, bypassing the role gate the screen view still enforces. That is a broken access control flaw (CWE-862, Missing Authorization): authentication held, but the authorization check already written for this handler does not run on the new return path, which is the shape of issue Aevral is built to read on a diff.
Keep Corgea for its scans and the fixes it generates across code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure; run Aevral for its own authorization and business-logic reading of the same pull requests, live on install.
No. Corgea does its stated job and keeps doing it. Aevral runs alongside it with its own reading: its PR review, live on install, looks for access control, business logic, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, and LLM-integration security on the pull requests it reviews, and its whole-repo scan reads access control and business logic across the repository at rest.
No. This page states each product's job and shows one worked example of Aevral's own reading. Results on your code depend on your code; evaluations belong to you.
Aevral is self-serve: install the GitHub App and log in to the console. The waitlist form is a launch-updates channel; joining does not reserve a price, access, or a contract.
More comparisons
The shorter version, at a glance: Corgea and Aevral on the works-alongside page.
Primary sources: Corgea: AI-powered application security platform; Corgea: GitHub pull request integration; Corgea: applying fixes; Corgea: business logic flaw detection; Aevral PR security review; Aevral whole-repo scan.
Install the GitHub App and PR review starts on. Sign in with GitHub to connect it, then press Scan for the repository you already have.
For professional use. By installing, you confirm you can act for the account or organization that owns it, and you accept the Terms and DPA on its behalf.