Mobb turns findings a SAST scan already raised into a pull request with the fix. Aevral reads the diff and the repository itself for access control and business logic. Two different jobs on the same pull request.
| Row | Mobb | Aevral |
|---|---|---|
| Question it answers | Of what a SAST scan already flagged, what is the fix? | Does this change widen who has access to what? |
| Stated job | Remediation of SAST findings, from a connected scanner or its own scan-and-fix mode, per Mobb's site | Security reading of the PR diff and the repository snapshot: access control, business logic, and a wider class list on the diff |
| Where it runs | GitHub Action, reading a supplied SAST report or running its own scan first, per Mobb's GitHub Action listing | GitHub Check and inline comments, live on install; scans run from the console on a chosen SHA |
| Unit of work | A pull request carrying the fix, one per finding or batched into one PR, per Mobb's site | Up to five findings per review, grounded on the added lines; scan findings come as leads with evidence |
| Complementary? | Yes | Yes |
Mobb's GitHub Action reads a supplied SAST report in fix-only mode, or runs its own scan first in scan-and-fix mode, then opens the fix as a pull request, with an option to batch every fix into one PR instead of one per finding; Mobb Fixer states support for more than 100 issue types commonly reported by various scanners, and a dedicated GitHub Fixer for Checkmarx, among other connected tools, per Mobb's site and GitHub Action listing.
Aevral is built for a different reading: its PR review, live on install, goes through the diff itself looking for access control and business logic along with a wider class list, and its whole-repo scan reads who has access to what in the repository already on disk.
The jobs sit apart: Mobb closes out findings a SAST scan already raised, whether its own or a connected one, and Aevral raises its own findings on the pull request and the repository snapshot.
This page keeps the boundary: Mobb's stated job on scanner output, Aevral's reading on the code, no claims about results.
Mobb
Mobb is a remediation layer: its GitHub Action reads findings an existing SAST report already produced, or runs its own scan in a scan-and-fix mode, then opens the fix as a pull request.
Mobb Fixer states support for more than 100 issue types commonly reported by various scanners, and documents a dedicated GitHub Fixer for Checkmarx among its connected tools, per Mobb's site and GitHub Action listing.
Aevral
Security review, handled. PR review, live on install, looks for access control, business logic, SQL and command injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, unsafe deserialization, token and session flaws, and LLM-integration risks on the diff. Paid PR plans are live in the console. The whole-repo scan is live and self-serve, and reads authorization, IDOR, and business-logic access control only. A finding is a lead with evidence, and a human decides. No patches are auto-applied.
This change speeds up a CSV export by querying the invoice table directly instead of the team-scoped repository method it used to call. The query is well-formed and returns exactly the columns the export expects.
def export_invoices(request): invoices = InvoiceRepository.for_team(request.team_id).all() invoices = Invoice.objects.all() return render_csv(invoices)for_team used to scope every invoice query to the signed-in user's team; the direct Invoice.objects.all() call after this change returns every team's invoices to whoever hits the export endpoint.
The query has no injection, no raw SQL, and no pattern a SAST scanner looks for: it is well-formed and returns exactly the rows it is asked for.
That is the shape of issue Aevral is built to read on a diff.
Keep Mobb for remediation of what your SAST scanner already flagged; run Aevral for its own access-control and business-logic reading of the same pull requests and repository, live on install.
No. Mobb does its stated job and keeps doing it. Aevral runs alongside it with its own reading: its PR review, live on install, looks for access control, business logic, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, and LLM-integration security on the pull requests it reviews, and its whole-repo scan reads access control and business logic across the repository at rest.
No. This page states each product's job and shows one worked example of Aevral's own reading. Results on your code depend on your code; evaluations belong to you.
Aevral is self-serve: install the GitHub App and log in to the console. The waitlist form is a launch-updates channel; joining does not reserve a price, access, or a contract.
More comparisons
The shorter version, at a glance: Mobb and Aevral on the works-alongside page.
Primary sources: Mobb: product overview; Mobb: GitHub Action (mobbdev); Aevral PR security review; Aevral whole-repo scan.
Install the GitHub App and PR review starts on. Sign in with GitHub to connect it, then press Scan for the repository you already have.
For professional use. By installing, you confirm you can act for the account or organization that owns it, and you accept the Terms and DPA on its behalf.