Two readings on one pull request: Qodo doing code review and standards enforcement, and Aevral adding its security reading of the same change.
| Row | Qodo | Aevral |
|---|---|---|
| Question it answers | Does this change meet the team's standards, and what does it break? | Who has access to what, and does this change widen it? |
| Stated job | Pull-request reviews with full codebase context, enforced team rules, and cross-repo review, per Qodo's site | Security reading of the PR diff: access control, business logic, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, LLM integration |
| Where it runs | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps pull requests, plus the IDE and CLI, per Qodo's site | GitHub Check and inline comments, live on install; scans run from the console on a chosen SHA |
| Unit of work | Review findings with severity and structured remediation, per Qodo's site | Up to five findings per review, grounded on the added lines |
| Complementary? | Yes | Yes |
Qodo is built as an AI code review and governance platform: specialized review agents reason over each change with full codebase context, a rules system turns team standards into enforced checks, and cross-repo review reads changes that touch dependent repositories, per Qodo's site. Aevral is built for a security reading of its own: whether a diff widens who has access to what, or carries injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, or LLM-integration flaws. Those are different readings of the same change, and a change can meet the quality bar while moving the access surface.
The framing is addition, not replacement: Qodo doing the review and standards enforcement it states, and Aevral adding its security reading of the same pull requests with Aevral's PR review, live on install. Aevral also reads the repository snapshot at rest, for authorization, IDOR, and business-logic access control only. This page makes no claim about results on your code.
Qodo
Qodo is an AI code review and governance platform. Its Git surface runs specialized review agents on pull requests with full codebase context, and its IDE surface validates code as developers write, per Qodo's site. A rules system turns team standards into enforced checks, and cross-repo review reads changes that touch dependent repositories, on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps.
Aevral
Security review, handled. PR review, live on install, looks for access control, business logic, SQL and command injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, unsafe deserialization, token and session flaws, and LLM-integration risks on the diff. Paid PR plans are live in the console. The whole-repo scan is live and self-serve, and reads authorization, IDOR, and business-logic access control only. A finding is a lead with evidence, and a human decides. No patches are auto-applied.
This change adds a bulk endpoint so several members can be updated in one call. The request body is parsed with a shared schema, the ids are scoped to the caller's organization, the tests pass, and the endpoint is typed end to end.
export async function POST(req: Request) { const session = await requireUser(req); await requireRole(session, "admin"); const { ids, role } = Bulk.parse(await req.json()); const updated = await db.member.updateMany({ where: { id: { in: ids }, orgId: session.orgId }, data: { role }, }); return Response.json({ count: updated.count });}The schema validates the shape of the request, and the org scope keeps the update inside the caller's organization. What changed is who can call it: the requireRole(session, "admin") line is gone, so any signed-in member of the organization can now set any other member's role, including their own, to admin. The code is valid, typed, and tested; the gate is what the refactor dropped, which is the class Aevral reads for on a diff.
Keep Qodo for code review and standards enforcement across your pull requests; run Aevral for its security reading of the same pull requests, live on install.
No. Qodo does its stated job and keeps doing it. Aevral runs alongside it with its own reading: its PR review, live on install, looks for access control, business logic, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, and LLM-integration security on the pull requests it reviews, and its whole-repo scan reads access control and business logic across the repository at rest.
No. This page states each product's job and shows one worked example of Aevral's own reading. Results on your code depend on your code; evaluations belong to you.
Aevral is self-serve: install the GitHub App and log in to the console. The waitlist form is a launch-updates channel; joining does not reserve a price, access, or a contract.
More comparisons
The shorter version, at a glance: Qodo and Aevral on the works-alongside page.
Primary sources: Qodo: what is Qodo; Qodo documentation; Qodo Merge on the GitHub Marketplace; Aevral PR security review; Aevral whole-repo scan.
Install the GitHub App and PR review starts on. Sign in with GitHub to connect it, then press Scan for the repository you already have.
For professional use. By installing, you confirm you can act for the account or organization that owns it, and you accept the Terms and DPA on its behalf.