[AI code review]

CodeRabbit and Aevral, at a glance

CodeRabbit reviews pull requests automatically, posts findings and suggested fixes on the change, and, with CodeRabbit Security, runs scheduled repository scans and security scans of each pull request, per CodeRabbit's site.

CodeRabbit reviews pull requests automatically: findings and suggested fixes on the change, plus reviews in the IDE and CLI, per CodeRabbit's docs. Its CodeRabbit Security product adds scheduled repository scans and security scans of each pull request, with verification of findings and reviewable fix pull requests. Aevral is built for a reading of its own: does this diff widen who has access to what. Both read pull requests for security: CodeRabbit Security with its scans, and Aevral's PR review, live and opt-in, on the same pull request.

CodeRabbit focuses on

Reviewing pull requests automatically, with findings and suggested fixes.
Reviewing uncommitted work in the IDE and from the CLI.
Monitoring the repository with CodeRabbit Security: scheduled repository scans and security scans of each pull request, per CodeRabbit's site.

Aevral adds alongside

The access reading of the same diff: dropped ownership checks, caller-controlled object references, gates that went from a role to a login.
With the opt-in add-on: up to two findings per review, grounded on the added lines, posted as a Check plus inline comments. It never blocks a merge.
A finding as a lead with evidence: the author decides with full information.

Run them together

Let CodeRabbit run its reviews, the IDE and CLI reviews, and CodeRabbit Security monitoring; let Aevral add the authorization and business-logic reading of the same pull requests, with the opt-in add-on.

CodeRabbit and Aevral, in depth; Aevral PR security review.

Also alongside

Scan your whole repo for access bugs.

One GitHub App. A report with evidence. A prompt for the agent you already use.

Join waitlist