[Autonomous product security]

Nullify and Aevral, at a glance

Nullify drives product-security findings from detection through validated, merge-ready remediation PRs to closure, priced on work performed, per Nullify's site.

Nullify validates findings for exploitability, triages them against your risk model, and fixes with merge-ready PRs that refactor themselves until checks pass, with broken access control and IDOR in its published detection scope, per Nullify's site. Aevral is built for a reading of its own: does this diff widen who has access to what. Both read pull requests: Nullify with its remediation flow, and Aevral's PR review, live and opt-in, for the access questions.

Nullify focuses on

Driving product-security work from detection to merge-ready fixes with an agent system.
Validating findings for exploitability with reproducible evidence, per Nullify's site.
Routing remediation PRs to owners and escalating only what needs a human decision.

Aevral adds alongside

The access reading of the pull request: dropped ownership checks, caller-controlled object references, gates that went from a role to a login.
With the opt-in add-on: up to two findings per review, grounded on the added lines, posted as a Check plus inline comments. It never blocks a merge.
A finding as a lead with evidence: the author decides with full information.

Run them together

Let Nullify drive remediation to merge-ready PRs; let Aevral add the authorization and business-logic reading of the same pull requests, with the opt-in add-on.

Nullify and Aevral, in depth; Aevral PR security review.

Also alongside

Scan your whole repo for access bugs.

One GitHub App. A report with evidence. A prompt for the agent you already use.

Join waitlist